Title: 13
Author: JOEG
Last saved by: Valued Gateway Client
Company: Auth Co

© 2001 Joe Griffin	                                   ▼                        01-11-06.JSH-567 /

The Inscrutable Question: Spiritual Decline in a Client Nation Causes Cultural Inversion and a Drift toward Humanism
	24-	Calling a principle ethical or moral does not make the principle right.  When a culture strays from its doctrinal underpinnings, the ethical and moral standards which result are nothing more than the prevailing attitudes of the majority.  Vox populi, vox dei: the voice of the people is the voice of God.  Gradually the prevailing standards of the new morality come into direct opposition with the absolutes required by doctrine.  Here are some examples:
a.	Doctrine says that homosexuality is a sin, an evil, and immoral.  On the contrary, the new morality based on prevailing public opinion calls it an “alternate lifestyle” that is inherited and amoral.  Those who take a biblical view of the behavior are decreed intolerant and mean-spirited.
b.	Doctrine says that extramarital sex is a sin, an evil, and immoral.  On the contrary, the new morality based on prevailing public opinion does not consider this behavior immoral unless practiced without using a condom.
c.	Doctrine says that murder is a sin, an evil, a crime, and immoral and punishable by State-sanctioned execution.  On the contrary, the new morality based on prevailing public opinion contends that the accused is not really responsible for what he has done because he has not been treated justly by society.  Further, to kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong is immoral.
A fallacy regarding the purpose of capital punishment should be noted here.  The rationale for capital punishment does not conclude that its primary function is to deter similar actions by others.  The Bible never implies such a thing.  Capital punishment is designed to punish the person who commits capital crimes.  If it should deter others from crime then that is a bonus.  But it is not the objective.  The objective is to punish the guilty.  Whether or not it deters anyone else is not the issue.  The issue is that the person is guilty and must be punished.  He is most definitely deterred from committing murder again.
Therefore, the argument as to whether capital punishment deters crime is missing the point.  If deterrence was the major objective it would be called capital deterrence, not capital punishment.
	25-	Therefore, to be strongly ethical with definite moral standards is meaningless unless you have doctrine as the foundation for those beliefs.  If not then what results is self-righteousness and crusader arrogance.
	26-	In promoting the new morality, its practitioners are not concerned with the means that might be required to obtain their desired ends since the means employed are never as important as the end desired.
	27-	This is why the self-righteous crusader sees no problem with reinterpreting the Constitution in order to achieve certain social ends which agree with the new morality.  When the end is achieved then justice is served regardless of the means required to reach it.
	28-	Those whose constitutional rights were violated in the process are seen as necessary casualties in the pursuit of a higher cause.  But when reaching their objective requires them to utilize the same rights withheld from others, no contradiction is admitted.
		Example: On many college campuses it is decreed by proponents of the new morality that a student may not express the belief that homosexuality is a sin and immoral.  Although this is a violation of two First Amendment rights, the proponents of the new morality are free under the First Amendment to assert that such a belief is intolerant, mean-spirited, and a hate crime.  The student who expressed his beliefs is expelled from school.  The end desired by the new moralists has been achieved but at the expense of the student’s constitutional rights.
	29-	Not only are establishment principles ignored but so are spiritual realities as well.  The stability of the client nation is dependent upon an order maintained by biblical ethics and morals. These are presently being ignored or denounced as old-fashioned.  
	30-	The end result is that the culture changes.  What is considered to be right is determined by prevailing public opinion.  Whenever public opinion changes, so do the ethics and morals of the commonwealth.  What is right becomes an ever-changing thing that gradually leads to instability and confusion among its citizens.
	31-	When the ethics and morals change enough then the nation’s culture begins to invert.  The people may remain citizens of the client nation but they live in an entirely different country than their forebears.
	32-	The inversion of the American Zeitgeist from its original biblically-based influences has led to an amalgamation of humanist philosophies developed from doctrines of demons that threatens the security of its client-nation status.
	33-	These humanist philosophies and doctrines of demons have become institutionalized into the jurisprudence of the nation’s laws and infused into the thinking of the masses.  This has led to the development of a secular religion whose tenets may be defined as follows:
		a.	Its “god” is the individual.
		b.	Its priesthood’s hierarchs are made up of sociologists and psychologists.
		c.	Its prophets and apostles are scientists with heavy emphasis on the medical profession.
d.	Scripture is written by these two groups and then taught by the local pastors.
e.	The local pastors are made up of educators, media elite, and a large number of the clergy.
f.	A hybrid theology of pantheism and humanism includes evolution, collectivism, multiculturalism, excessive and blind altruism, world peace, women’s liberation, alternate lifestyles, and total freedom with no restraint on decisions and no responsibility for actions.
g.	Ethics and morals are communicated by the priesthood of sociologists and psychologists.
h.	Logistics are promised from the prophets of science and technology.
i.	This religion has a system of faith in an unholy trinity which promises security, longevity, and peace of mind: government, medicine, and psychology.
j.	Faith is placed in the government for security, in medicine for longevity, and in psychology for peace of mind.
k.	So that the human viewpoint of a flawed theology functioning in a fallen environment can maintain its credibility, government, medicine, and psychology must remain inviolate and their practitioners must achieve perfection.
l.	Being human, this is impossible but explains why politicians must have an impeccable résumé to run for and maintain office, why physicians must be sued for malpractice, and why psychologists must never allow the individual to be held responsible for his decisions.
m.	Further, all these categories must be able to solve all man’s problems, to do so on request, and without delay.
	34-	This inversion of thought has dimmed the glory of America—the city set on a hill is becoming obscure.  She has rejected her foundational principles of a client nation which were incorporated into the Constitution and the culture.

Grace Doctrine Church Media Ministries:	     www.gracedoctrinechurch.com          www.joegriffin.org	www.gdcmedia.org